Self-determination in harmony with AllM

The collateral account is a debt and not a credit balance

Not millions in the plus, at least not for us, but in the minus. It is the royalty to the Pope for the use of the name.

Why? Because we are slaves.

Children of slaves who carry on the slave debts of their ancestors.

To be judged and treated according to the slave law of the Romans and the famous collateral account is a DEBT and not a credit.

Since the modern man, bombarded with short-lived news, rarely has the time to read long articles to the end, my conclusion, which I originally wanted to put at the end, comes directly at the beginning and the explanation and deduction comes afterwards.

I know this statement the collateral account turns everything commerce teaches on its head.

Private commerce is like any doctrine in our occupied world - truth mixed with lies so that the reader's gut instinct can be tricked out and he can be steered in the desired direction.




As early as 1840 Jacob Venedey wrote the following description in his book Römertum und Germanentum Umgestaltung der Sklaverei:

The old Roman Empire was founded by a band of robbers and vagabonds whose leader had been suckled by a she-wolf. The gates of the new city were open to anyone whom the neighbouring cities expelled as a criminal or unworthy of citizenship. And when the number of men streaming in from all sides became too great for the number of Roman women, the Romans stole the wives and daughters of the neighboring cities.

Thus the band of robbers became the state, thus robbery became conquest, and robbers became conquerors.

This formed the basis of the city that was called to rule over the whole civilized world one day.

The law of the strongest is that of conquest, and so Rome existed only as long as it was able to make conquests. Wealth was considered an honor, and through it one came to glory, to positions and power. Virtue disappeared, poverty became a disgrace, and purity of morals was considered strange. The youth, educated in luxury and extravagance, gave themselves up to debauchery, ambition and greed. They stole in order to squander what they had stolen, they despised what they possessed and lusted after what they did not possess. Honor, morality, virtue, all divine and human laws (natural law) were disregarded, and one strove for nothing but the means by which one could satisfy unnatural desires.

Men dishonor themselves by the shameful degradation of themselves. The indulgence goes so far that all the lands and all the seas are scarcely sufficient to fill the tables and the dishes. Youth, accustomed to vice, abandons itself to theft and murder as soon as it runs out of money. Torn by passions, it is forced to seek all means to satisfy them, and theft and profligacy join hands and help each other.

Oppression was the breath that gave Rome life. It was at constant war with mankind."

This wealth of Rome had as its basis slavery. The terms factory slavery (Elemer Polay) or mass slavery, took their origin there. This mass slavery was the foundation of Rome's wealth and also her downfall. For Rome made a mistake. The slaves knew that they were slaves. They were aware of their slave status. And at some point, this knowledge brought down the Roman Empire of criminals, who are always portrayed in such a sophisticated way in today's history.

My contention, however, is that it happened only superficially.

Kollateralkonto Schwindel Bluntschli 01

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar - German Private Law 1860

The powers that be were aware of this small systemic flaw and realized that a restructuring was needed.

The newly sprouted religion of the acquiescent slave, which had already been well used for immobilization ("God wants it this way", "Always stay in love and turn the other cheek when you are hit" - reminds me of the newly installed esotericism, the new "Christianity" with their mottos - "Everything you experience, WATCH You just to learn", "You chose that yourself before"... "Accept everything in love...", "We are all One..." etc. etc.), they decided to expand.

The Constantinian turn with the now obviously known forgery called donation, formed the basis for this. The emperor's new clothes were now those of a pope. One put on new clothes for the pig, so to speak. Thus the Roman right with the beloved slavery crept secretly over the back door into the laws of the free peoples. And today.... the inclined reader will have to admit, we have the conditions of Rome as described above. The systemic error, however, has been corrected. Today's slaves do not even notice that they are slaves. It is nevertheless every day eingebläut to them, in what a free world we live nevertheless - we can choose always completely freely our television station.

They subtly realize that they are not free, but cannot really grasp anything. This feeling is like a fog. Visible, but nothing you can grasp and hold on to. The new arenas have been converted, but they always serve the same purpose. The immobilization of the masses. The technical possibilities available in this era make the control even more efficient and deeper.

But the key point remains. We are all traded and dealt with according to the law of slaves.

But what exactly is slavery?


Is the condition of a human being who is deprived of his personal freedom, is treated as a thing, and as such is the property of another. In the ancient world, whose economic system was largely based on slavery, slavery was widespread, in that slaves were generally used to perform domestic and industrial services, and prisoners of war in particular had been used for this purpose since ancient times. Thus, in ancient times, we find slavery widespread among the peoples of the Orient as well as among the Greeks and Romans, the latter of whom had developed slavery into a special legal institution. The slave (servus), according to Roman law, which, by the way, in older times permitted slavery to arise even through debt bondage, had no personality and, precisely for this reason, no legal capacity. He was a mere object of commerce, the children of slaves were slaves from birth, and the master had the right over the life and death of the slave. What the slave earned belonged to the master. Only gradually did the peculium system develop, which allowed slaves to acquire their own property (peculium) from their secondary earnings in a limited way, thus giving them the opportunity to buy their freedom. But even the freedmen (libertini) were still dependent on the patron who had freed them.

Source: Mayer's Konversationslexikon

mayers konvlex sklave 001 min
Venedey Jakob min

Source: Jacob Venedey - Romanism, Christianity and Germanicism in their Interaction in the Transformation of Slavery from 1860

Thus, under Roman law, slaves have no right to property, ownership, and no legal capacity - the person.

According to Roman law, children of slaves are also slaves.

A slave has no right to defend himself in court (nowadays it's called the duty of a lawyer, precisely because we are not of age and therefore under supervision).

Our labor is mortgaged and traded on the market.

Adolf Schmidt – Die Persoenlichkeit des Sklaven nach roemischen Recht. 1868 2 min

Source: Adolf Schmidt - Die Persönlichkeit des Sklaven nach römischen Recht. 1868

Since the right to personality is thus denied to us and thus the participation in the system is denied, as slaves we are subject to the lawlessness of not having a person of our own - one is given to us - identical to the name given to us by the producers - for the sake of simplicity, one does not have to come up with new names for the newly produced slaves and in order to disguise it, and so the slave does not even notice that the intellectual property of the name given to him by his slave parents has been stolen (not even that, because everything the slave does, owns and also thinks about belongs to his master from the beginning) and claimed for himself by his slave master.

Adolf Schmidt – Die Persoenlichkeit des Sklaven nach roemischen Recht. 1868 3 min
Adolf Schmidt – Die Persoenlichkeit des Sklaven nach roemischen Recht. 1868 4 min

Source: Adolf Schmidt - Die Persönlichkeit des Sklaven nach römischen Recht. 1868

Since our labor has been mortgaged in advance ( according to the doctrine of private commerce - due to state bankruptcy, as collateral to the banks) - we are in debt bondage.

But what exactly is debt bondage? Let's take a look at good old Wikipedia, which doesn't feel obliged to lie about such things:

(Debt bondage Wikipedia:

Debt bondage (obsolete Obnoxiation)[1] is the legal status or situation of an insolvent person. Debtor, who in Servitude ...and I'm not sure... As Security over the Creditors he has to put his manpower pledgeBut he has no prospect of paying off his debt and getting free again through the work he has done. The creditor can decide alone and arbitrarily on the nature and duration of the dependence. This results in a dependency that is intended to be permanent, slavery-like dependency relationship, which is characterized by unilateral Exploitation is characterized. According to a definition of the United Nations it may also be the case that the debtor pledges the labour of a person dependent on him.[2]

But how do we get into debt bondage? Just because we are children of slaves, since our parents and grandparents, etc., are already slaves? Hasn't slavery been outlawed? Theoretically, yes. But as we are taught even in the slave training school, called school? Silence is consent and this is exactly how it is practiced in the system.

So how did this happen? What happened?



The pope Bonifatius VIII declared himself in 1302 with the bull Unam Sanctam the ruler of the world in spiritual as well as in temporal matters. In it, he decreed that all living beings on this planet are subject to the pope, thereby claiming control over the entire earth.

Pope Nicholas V then decreed in the papal bull Romanus Pontifex im year 1455, that the newborn child be separated from all right to property.

Pope Sixtus IV issued a bull... Aeterni Regis (roughly, "Perpetual dominion" or "Perpetual possession of the sovereign") 1481, that the child is being deprived of his rights to his body. Thus, everyone is condemned from birth to eternal servitude.

In 1537 the papal bull of convocation of Pope Paul III followed, in which the Roman Catholic Church lays claim to the soul of the child.

Thus, these proclamations of the "holy" FATHER, whose immature sheep/children we are, still stand perfectly valid and legitimate in space.


Not rejected.

General Accepted.

Accepted by silence and thereby legitimized.

Just as a right.

Everything on the planet belongs to him. Even all people, including your possessions, your body, even your soul. Why should the devil still come to earth and haggle for the individual souls, except out of boredom coupled with ego confirmation? His deputy does his job quite well after all....

Since the majority of people (whether Christianity or unconsciously, through the negative selection of its offshoot and creation Islam, or the other branch Judaism) still accept and regard it as a "holy" institution, it legitimizes it in its claim on the world and all that is in it.

Thus these bulls are valid until today! And every man his slave. He is the "Holy" Father.

Since the Pope as the representative of God has proclaimed that the earth and everything on it belongs to him, we can never be the owner of anything - on the one hand because everything belongs to him anyway, on the other hand because slaves cannot own property anyway, because as it is said according to Roman law, everything that a slave acquires, he acquires for his master. If the slave means to acquire it and considers himself the owner, it is to be led back on the infantility of the slave...

After all, it is clearly stated in the vehicle registration document, for example, that this is not proof of ownership. If the residential property were indeed ours, then, from a purely logical point of view, one would not have to pay any property tax on one's already purchased property, nor would one have to pay any tax on one's inheritance or on what one earns, in wages and salary.... In modern parlance it could be called royalties for use.

The new revised system of slavery of Rome 2.0 in the update, is thus a mixture of slavery, debt bondage and fealty. Perfectly combined, veiled, so that the New Ring enslaves the slaves forever - without the annoying slave revolts of the past, of course, and without them noticing how this comes about and from where - in a system of many straw men, called government, party - which is based on democratic elections (from their contempt for the common rabble, they make no secret even in the name of it - because the etymological meaning clearly names it as "Reign of Scum" ) and shoulder-shrugging say "you have chosen, it was YOUR decision" ... That this is all of course a play on a stage, escapes most hard-working slaves. Because just because you vote, it does not mean that it will be counted accordingly.

It also does not matter whether one belongs to Christianity, is baptized or not.

Baptism, by the way, means to immerse, to make deep.

The Origin Dictionary to the Duden (Duden, Vol. 7, Bibliographisches Institut & F.A. Brockhaus, 2007) explains the origin of the word "taufen" thus:

taufen: The gemeingerm. verb taufen, ahd. toufan, got. daupjan, aengl. diepan, Swedish döpa is derived from the adjective treated under tief. So it actually means "to make deep", i.e. "to immerse, to submerge".

With this process the human being is dipped into the Holy Sea of the Vatican (maritime law) and handed over to it and at the same time placed low. But since everyone and everything belongs to the Vatican according to the cops anyway, this act does not really play the big role to belong to the inventory.

We now look at the role of the father in Roman law and among the Romans.

helfeld 1 min

Paternal authority is that which is vested in parents over their children, or in grandparents over their grandchildren, by virtue of which they have complete government of their persons, and unlimited administration of their property.

...which therefore is not to be inferred from any such presumed consent of the children, or special contracts....

...Act in the court, and may represent named persons...

...only the father is in charge of the children...

...that with the former, the father could sell the children without distinction...

helfeld 2 min
helfeld 3 min
helfeld 4 min
helfeld 5 min
helfeld 6 min

Source: Hellfeld, Johann August - Repertorivm Reale Practicvm Ivris Privati Imperii Romano-Germanici 1762


MG 9149 1 min

For according to Roman law the children were always in the manus of the father, under his hand. At the father's discretion, he could do with the children as he pleased. Also sell... The detachment or release of the son from the father took place in a ritual of the mock SALE of the son. There was also a law that if the father had sold his son three times, he was automatically free. So much for the moral attitude of the Romans, which probably also the "Holy" Roman father lives on the Papsttron.

oberlaender samuel min

Source: Oberländer Samuel - Latin Teutsches Juristisches Handlexikon 1721

Schmidt 01
Schmidt 02

Dr. Adolf Schmidt - The Personality of the Slave under Roman Law. 1868


Jastrow 01
Jastrow 02
Jastrow 03
Jastrow 06 2
Jastrow 05
Jastrow 06

Source: Ignaz Jastrow - Criminal Law Position of the Slave 1878

How do you want to fight something and revolt against it, if you don't even know WHAT you are supposed to revolt against. And if then nevertheless times the slaves revolt and overthrow a straw man called government, then one installs evenly a new one.

So the big debt we have to pay is that the natural person (and the legal person) is provided for us by the system. Because, after all, we are lawless. This is precisely the wonderful, coveted and longed-for collateral account. The famous carrot in front of the donkey that makes it run.

In the commercial courses and the knowledge imparted, it is touted as OUR property, of which we are the beneficiaries.

The account on which on "our" name millions lie and with which everything is PREPAID. And it had been created for our good, but since we have not yet recognized our value, like children, it is still withheld from us. And everybody believes this nonsense... As if in this system of the matrix something was ever created for the benefit of the people... It is a huge minus amount (to our disadvantage), which results from the fact that this system was introduced at some point and since this debt can never be paid off by the licensee of the person in his life, his children continue as pawns and heirs of this debt. It is perpetual debt bondage. Beyond death.

The collateral account is also called the basis and effect of acceptances, so everyone who tries it, shoots himself in the own leg ... Because a real success, which could not demonstrate and prove any commercialist that we know.

Let's see what the word collator means:

here we take the good Johann Christoph Nehring with his book Historisch-Politisch-Juristisches Lexikon from 1710 as a source:

Collator... who confers an office or benefice; so also are the patrons of the parishes called.

Collatur, a parish fief/ as Jus collaturae the parish naming and appointing right.


Wiesland min
wiesand02 min

According to Wiesand, G. S. - Juristisches Handbuch die teutschen Rechte 1762 personam ammitere means as much as, as his freyheit verlieret.

"Have courage to use your own mind."

Immanuel Kant

And in Mayer's Konversationslexikon 1877 we find the following statement:

Person (lat.Persona), originally the larva or mask covering the whole head, by which in antiquity actors expressed the character of their role; then also the acting role: the way in which a person presents himself outwardly; in general, designation for the actual characteristic of a person, in jurisprudence every being that can be the subject of rights and legal relationships. In the latter respect, the concepts of person and man are not the same, inasmuch as there are persons who are not persons, and inasmuch as there used to be persons who were not persons. For legislation, by constructing a so-called legal person, has given the possibility of linking personality to something other than a physical individual....

mayers konv person min

...On the other hand, the slave of antiquity was without rights; he was considered a thing, precisely because he lacked the right of personality, the legal capacity, which nowadays in civilized states belongs to every human being.

mayers konv person2 min

Source: Mayer's Konversationslexikon

A person is called that quality of a man on which his condition in the Republic depends and from which the rights of each in particular are to be recognized. In Rome, a great difference was made between a man and a person, since the servants (slaves are meant here - since the Germanic servant had a different legal status than the servus according to Roman law) did not lead a person at all.

hellfeld Person Definition min

Source: Hellfeld, Johann August - Repertorivm Reale Practicvm Ivris Privati Imperii Romano-Germanici 1762

But since people therefore need a person in order to be able to participate in life quasi independently, and the representative, who has been recognized for hundreds of years, is so nice and takes care of his flock under his hand (manus), the following happens...

The slave parents who gave birth to a slave baby go to their administrative point, called office, and report the new property to its owner (or to the administrator, because the pope is also only the administrator...).

Thus a bond, called a natural person with the birth certificate is created, the value of the new slave is calculated on the basis of his origin, and thus the price of the license, the loan fee, the fief value is fixed.

Because the term obligation is a DEBT according to the legal dictionary from 1783. The collateral account is therefore from all the above concluded not a credit. It is a debt! A debt which is imposed on the human being and by means of which he is subjugated until the end of his life. Since the sum is set very high, since one must still work off the debts of the ancestors and forefathers and all the extorted royalties - taxes called, are not covered, the descendants of the slaves come again automatically into the slavery, the debt bondage. Because bonds are connections.

Lemke Juristisches Obligation min

Obligatio a connection or link/obligation/legal bond/by which we are compelled/to perform or pay something.

Source: Oberländer Samuel - Latin Teutsches Juristisches Handlexikon 1721

A bond is a document by which a person undertakes to pay a debt to another person. It can be issued by all persons who can be bound by law, but not by minors and others.

Wiesand Obligation 01 min
Wiesand Obligation 02 min
Wiesand Obligation 03 min

Wiesand - Legal Handbook of German Rights 1762

Lemke Juristisches Obligation wirklich min

Obligatio is also the name of a bond...

Source: Lemke, Johann Friedrich Wilhelm - Legal Dictionary 1783

Thus, the people who are aware of the injustice of the system and go in search of how one can escape from it all, will sooner or later come across the private commerce, which, like everything in the exoteric world, mixes truth with lies and then lets the people with the teaching about the acceptance, once again so beautifully run into the trap. As punishment quasi for the disobedience of the slave.

Speaking of acceptance...

Accepta sententia, an accepted/accepted verdict.

Acceptans, the one who accepts the bill elsewhere.

Acceptatio juramenti, the acceptance of the oath, is/when one actually offers oneself in a certain time for the deposition of the oath awarded and at the same time asks/that the opposing party be citied to it, then a certain date ad jurandum is set/at which/if both do not appear/the date is held pro circumducto/and therefore the one/who is interested in settling the matter/must at his own expense/extract another date/ but if only one appears/he must strive/that the other remaining out may be accused of disobedience/and so the oath may either be sworn or remitted/held.

Oberlaender Accept min

Source: Oberländer Samuel - Latin Teutsches Juristisches Handlexikon 1721

Thus, the current construct surrounding us and weaving into the system is slavery, serfdom with a form of fiefdom... Since the secular lord, the Pope as head of the Vatican must therefore not worry about the administration in detail. This is done for him by the slave, who does not know that he is a slave. So he can't revolt, like in ancient Rome.

Our everyday life situation also fits the description of serfdom excellently, which is what it is.

hayme 01 min
hayme 02 min
hayme 03 min
hayme 04 min
hayme 05 min

Source: Hayme, Thomas - Altes teutsches juristisches Wörterbuch 1738

Lehnwesen Mayer min

Source: Mayer's Konversationslexikon

The Roman Empire, and Rome as a generic term for all the depravity, was unfortunately not defeated by the Germanic tribes (which, excitingly, is why you don't learn about it in history class.) But rather it remained in transformation and came through the back door. Slowly and steadily. And successfully put itself back in the saddle as the Roman law of justice that rides us to this day.

suggenheim 1
suggenheim 2
suggenheim 3
suggenheim 4

Source: Sugenheim, Samuel - Abolition of serfdom in Europe 19 century 1861

Germany's clear aspiration at the time was to abolish serfdom, which was never on a par with slavery anyway, as servants at least had certain rights.

So once again one created a problem and then offered the solution. And thus rebuilt the society of the people who were once the victors over Rome.

Also, the church explicitly worked to establish and maintain serfdom.

suggenheim 5 min
suggenheim 6 min
suggenheim 7 min
suggenheim 8 min
suggenheim 9 min
suggenheim 10 min
suggenheim 5 min
suggenheim 6 min
suggenheim 7 min
suggenheim 8 min
suggenheim 9 min
suggenheim 10 min

Source: Sugenheim, Samuel - Abolition of serfdom in Europe 19 century 1861

Margraf min
margraf 2 min
margraf 3 min
margraf 4 min

Source: Josef Margraf - Kirche und Sklaverei seit der Entdeckung Amerikas oder was hat die katholische Kirche seit der Entdeckung Amerikas theils zur Mildernung theils zur Aufhebung der Sklaverei gethan? From the year 1865

A prize writing crowned by the theological faculty of Munich.

Thus, these statements seen above are even sanctioned by the church.

"And the day came when the risk of remaining in bud became more painful than the risk of blooming."

Anaïs Nin